tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-68757946293685606872024-02-20T18:05:47.186-08:00movie IMPRESSIONSjust musingsJavier Aldabaldehttp://www.blogger.com/profile/00426828972109311760noreply@blogger.comBlogger2125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6875794629368560687.post-17143296198097562692015-02-05T15:34:00.002-08:002015-02-05T18:31:17.469-08:00The Tree of Life (2011, Malick)<div style="text-align: justify;">
<span style="font-family: Georgia, Times New Roman, serif;">Terrence Malick's cosmic elegy is not just larger-than-life: it bypasses life. The movie confirms what theologists deny but we may suspect: that there is an unmistakable triteness to eternity. Upon its release, it became one of those films lambasted and worshipped for all the wrong reasons. There is nothing confusing about it (there isn't much to get) but, sadly, the pictorial qualities for which it was so revered are nothing memorable either. The brilliant cinematographer, Emmanuel Lubezki, becomes the pimp of life and beauty, an archangel of light tracing the steps of Jessica Chastain's suburban Virgin Mary. The succession of "exquisite" and "poetic" images, so tenderly "in the moment" that it becomes painfully evident how staged they are, have the tendency to drown themselves out at the same moment they are projected. Everything is as perfectly pure, clean and picturesque as a screensaver. Nothing feels lived-in; nothing is tangible. How does Malick expect us to embrace the eternal if we're not even allowed to mourn the transient? His airiness is his worst enemy: it destroys juxtapositions that are essential to the work. </span><span style="font-family: Georgia, 'Times New Roman', serif;">The film seems the trance-like state of a Buddhist who fell in love with Christianity and deprived it of all the barbarism and devilry that made it interesting to begin with, until only the hallowed core remained: the banal promise of saintliness. It can't quite shake off the odor of New Age "love and harmony", either, and there are bizarre prehistoric reveries that don't really work. And d</span><span style="font-family: Georgia, 'Times New Roman', serif;">espite all the blatant aestheticism, t</span><span style="font-family: Georgia, 'Times New Roman', serif;">here is not one moment of </span><i style="font-family: Georgia, 'Times New Roman', serif;">real</i><span style="font-family: Georgia, 'Times New Roman', serif;"> beauty in it. </span><span style="font-family: Georgia, 'Times New Roman', serif;">This film has the dubious effect of making one long for some old-fashioned materialism.</span></div>
Javier Aldabaldehttp://www.blogger.com/profile/00426828972109311760noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6875794629368560687.post-83067353162082755092015-02-05T15:34:00.001-08:002015-02-05T16:06:53.138-08:00Vicky Cristina Barcelona (2008, Allen)<div style="text-align: justify;">
<a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEjjZce9AfwwiVkG0D_jDBbvWxiDRydx8o29b7gwBSL0PuX8HmEHDIwdK4bCIbhUzU7QxZerKw-eJDvH9muBffy31_v0UG-bR_WjFtZnGQ2t6jxKzJZJh2scVbxv2By49rwY4NWOtp6NT4w/s1600/cruz.JPG" imageanchor="1" style="clear: right; float: right; margin-bottom: 1em; margin-left: 1em;"><img border="0" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEjjZce9AfwwiVkG0D_jDBbvWxiDRydx8o29b7gwBSL0PuX8HmEHDIwdK4bCIbhUzU7QxZerKw-eJDvH9muBffy31_v0UG-bR_WjFtZnGQ2t6jxKzJZJh2scVbxv2By49rwY4NWOtp6NT4w/s1600/cruz.JPG" height="112" width="200" /></a><span style="font-family: Georgia, Times New Roman, serif;">The movie simpers along until she deigns to appear: drunk, battered, surreally sexy. Penélope Cruz's María Elena obliterates everyone and everything on screen, and she does it with the natural superiority of a true comedienne. In her performance, English is the comedy and Spanish the drama. The linguistic enmity is a thing of explosive beauty: she is at odds with herself and the world. (Her savagery of English gives her added nobility). Woody Allen writes and directs her as some kind of mythical Mediterranean goddess - a wild thing of the Barcelona forests - living on the edge of the civilized world. But Cruz gives her relevancy. In the movie's best scene, she tears apart her prey - the meek American tourist played by Scarlett Johansson - limb by limb while nonchalantly spouting impossibly racist remarks and predicting the weather by sheer force of instinct. Her vitality is a double-edged sword: it renders the rest of this passable dramedy irrelevant. She seems to be Woody Allen's ideal of the Artist-Muse, but Cruz turns this joke of a character and her own excruciating English into works of art. This bilingual contradiction is a creature of our times</span>.</div>
Javier Aldabaldehttp://www.blogger.com/profile/00426828972109311760noreply@blogger.com0